Prep Baseball Report

Huntsville Preseason ID: Data Dive, Pitchers


Austin Sharp
Alabama Scouting Director

 

HUNTSVILLE, AL - The Huntsville Preseason ID was held on Thursday, January 4th at Clutch Performance in Huntsville, AL. This event was an open event that consisted of prospects from the 2024-2029 classes. These players went through extended pro-style workout that included batting practice using Trackman and Blast Motion, ran the 30 yard dash using Swift Performance, and much more. Pitchers were able to throw in simulated bullpens during the workout and were able to get numbers and metrics off of our Trackman unit, such as pitch velocity, spin rate, horizontal & vertical movement & much more. There were some players who showed up and continued to build off of prior performances, but there were also some new names who jumped onto our radar with a strong showing on Thursday.

Last week, we broke down the stat leaders from the more traditional categories in our statistical analysis. Today, we will take an even closer look at the pitchers in attendance with the help of our tech partners, broken down by the categories and leaderboards below.

FASTBALL 

MAX VELOCITY (MPH)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Velocity (max)
1 Joshua Henson AL Buckhorn 2025 SS 88.6 mph
2 Evan Dodd AL Whitesburg Christian 2024 RHP 85.0 mph
3 Aiden Kletke AL Sparkman High School 2024 OF 83.7 mph
4 Jackson Davis AL Virgil Grissom High School 2025 3B 83.2 mph
5 Graham Segraves AL Bob Jones 2027 RHP 82.2 mph

SPIN RATE (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Spin Rate (avg)
1 Evan Dodd AL Whitesburg Christian 2024 RHP 2387 rpm
2 Joshua Henson AL Buckhorn 2025 SS 2295 rpm
3 Brenner VanDeWynckel AL Sparkman High School 2026 LHP 2248 rpm
4 Jackson Davis AL Virgil Grissom High School 2025 3B 2238 rpm
5 David Potts AL Skyline 2028 RHP 2197 rpm

Spin Rate: This metric calculates the rate of spin on the baseball as it leaves the pitcher’s hand, measured in revolutions per minute (rpm). Historical data shows that high-spin fastballs lessen the impact of gravity, allowing for more ‘rise’ (or less fall, in other words) as it carries through the zone. Low-spin fastballs typically indicate the pitch has greater horizontal action, often making it tougher to square up, but generally easier to make contact with, leading to more ground balls, while high-spin fastballs show a correlation with swings and misses.

SPIN EFFICIENCY% (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Spin Efficiency % (avg)
1 Jackson Davis AL Virgil Grissom High School 2025 3B 98 %
2 Brenner VanDeWynckel AL Sparkman High School 2026 LHP 97 %
3 Burke Garrett AL Whitesburg Christian Academy 2026 LHP 94 %
4 Kaleb Robinson AL Whitesburg Christian 2025 RHP 92 %
5 Truitt Taylor AL Huntsville High School 2025 RHP 91 %

Spin Efficiency: This metric is the percentage of the raw spin rate that directly impacts pitch movement; so while raw spin is measured by revolutions per minute (rpm), spin efficiency is the ratio of true spin divided by raw spin. It’s important to understand that more is not always better when it comes to spin efficiency. The optimal spin efficiency on a pitch depends on the pitch type and should be understood in the context of a pitcher’s entire arsenal. Regarding the true four-seam fastball, a spin efficiency close to 100 percent is preferable, indicating that nearly all the backspin generated on the ball as it leaves the pitcher’s hand is contributing to the “riding” action the pitch has as it enters and exits the strike zone, making it especially effective in the upper third of the strike zone.

INDUCED VERTICAL BREAK (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos IVB (avg)
1 Burke Garrett AL Whitesburg Christian Academy 2026 LHP 23.3 in
2 Kaleb Robinson AL Whitesburg Christian 2025 RHP 19.2 in
3 Brenner VanDeWynckel AL Sparkman High School 2026 LHP 18.2 in
4 Jackson Davis AL Virgil Grissom High School 2025 3B 17.0 in
5 Cayden McCormack AL Wilson 2026 RHP 16.6 in

Induced Vertical Break: Used in short form as "IVB," this metric is most important on fastballs for creating rise and on curveballs for creating depth – it can also have some use when measuring sliders and cutters as well. Sliders tend to be closer to zero inches while cutters are generally between 5 and 15 inches. Usually fastballs and curveballs with large IVB have higher spin efficiencies as well. Sliders generally have very little (closer to zero) IVB and very low spin efficiency. You could also categorize IVB into spin rate as this is part of the “useful movement” you’re looking for. IVB is also a huge part of the vertical approach angle.

HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos HM (avg)
1 Will Jones AL Huntsville High School 2026 OF 13.2
2 Caleb Vallejo AL Grissom 2024 RHP 12.8
3 Brenner VanDeWynckel AL Sparkman High School 2026 LHP -11.6
4 Kaleb Robinson AL Whitesburg Christian 2025 RHP 9.5
5 Brooks Harris AL Hazel Green High School 2026 2B 9.3

Horizontal Break: Outlined on TrackMan’s own website: “... horizontal movement is measured in inches between where the pitch actually crosses the front of home plate side-wise, and where it would have crossed home plate side-wise if had it traveled in a perfectly straight line from release. A positive number means the break was to the right from the pitcher’s perspective, while a negative number means the break was to the left from the pitcher’s perspective.”

STRIKE ZONE RATE%

Rank Name State School Class Pos Zone %
1 Jackson Nichols AL Scottsboro 2026 RHP 100 %
2 Zachary Schenck AL James Clemens 2026 3B 71 %
3 Caleb Vallejo AL Grissom 2024 RHP 60 %
4 Tristan Blalock AL James Clemens High School 2029 3B 57 %
^ Evan Dodd AL Whitesburg Christian 2024 RHP 57 %
5 Will Jones AL Huntsville High School 2026 OF 50 %
^ Jackson Davis AL Virgil Grissom High School 2025 3B 50 %
^ Mason Brewer AL Hartselle 2028 3B 50 %
^ Reece Thomas AL Huntsville High School 2025 2B 50 %
^ Joshua Henson AL Buckhorn 2025 SS 50 %
^ Brenner VanDeWynckel AL Sparkman High School 2026 LHP 50 %

Average MLB pitchers throw 62 percent strikes, and better pitchers throw strikes 65 percent of the time, or a ratio of roughly 2:1, strikes to balls.


CURVEBALL

SPIN RATE (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Spin Rate (avg)
1 Kyler Campbell AL Buckhorn High School 2025 LHP 2401 rpm
2 Will Jones AL Huntsville High School 2026 OF 2311 rpm
3 David Potts AL Skyline 2028 RHP 2261 rpm
4 Caleb Vallejo AL Grissom 2024 RHP 2247 rpm
5 Jackson Davis AL Virgil Grissom High School 2025 3B 2244 rpm

HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos HM (avg)
1 Brooks Harris AL Hazel Green High School 2026 2B -15.8
2 David Potts AL Skyline 2028 RHP -14.5
3 Caleb Vallejo AL Grissom 2024 RHP -13.5
4 Kaleb Robinson AL Whitesburg Christian 2025 RHP -13.0
5 Casen Dutton AL Priceville 2026 RHP -12.5

STRIKE ZONE RATE%

Rank Name State School Class Pos Zone %
1 Brenner VanDeWynckel AL Sparkman High School 2026 LHP 100 %
^ Landon Scott AL Huntsville High School 2025 OF 100 %
^ Jackson Nichols AL Scottsboro 2026 RHP 100 %
2 Jackson Davis AL Virgil Grissom High School 2025 3B 75 %
^ Kaleb Robinson AL Whitesburg Christian 2025 RHP 75 %
3 Truitt Taylor AL Huntsville High School 2025 RHP 66 %
4 Caleb Vallejo AL Grissom 2024 RHP 50 %
5 Warner Johnson AL Deshler 2027 LHP 33 %
^ Casen Dutton AL Priceville 2026 RHP 33 %
^ Jaxon Poag AL Mars Hill Bible 2024 OF 33 %


SLIDER

SPIN RATE (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Spin Rate (avg)
1 Evan Dodd AL Whitesburg Christian 2024 RHP 2383
2 Joshua Henson AL Buckhorn 2025 SS 2211
3 Landon Scott AL Huntsville High School 2025 OF 2036
4 Cayden McCormack AL Wilson 2026 RHP 1986
5 Brenner VanDeWynckel AL Sparkman High School 2026 LHP 1853

HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos HM (avg)
1 Tristan Blalock AL James Clemens High School 2029 3B -16.5
2 Cayden McCormack AL Wilson 2026 RHP -10.1
3 Joshua Henson AL Buckhorn 2025 SS -7.8
4 Andrew Summers AL WHITESBURG CHRISTIAN ACADEMY 2025 OF -6.5
5 Jaxon Poag AL Mars Hill Bible 2024 OF 0.5

STRIKE ZONE RATE%

Rank Name State School Class Pos Zone %
1 Jaxon Poag AL Mars Hill Bible 2024 OF 100 %
^ Brenner VanDeWynckel AL Sparkman High School 2026 LHP 100 %
2 Andrew Summers AL WHITESBURG CHRISTIAN ACADEMY 2025 OF 50 %
3 Joshua Henson AL Buckhorn 2025 SS 40 %
^ Landon Scott AL Huntsville High School 2025 OF 40 %


CHANGEUP

SPIN RATE (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Spin Rate (avg)
1 Jackson Davis AL Virgil Grissom High School 2025 3B 2176 rpm
2 Landon Scott AL Huntsville High School 2025 OF 1924 rpm
3 Truitt Taylor AL Huntsville High School 2025 RHP 1906 rpm
4 Will Jones AL Huntsville High School 2026 OF 1865 rpm
5 Joshua Henson AL Buckhorn 2025 SS 1839 rpm

HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos HM (avg)
1 Kaleb Robinson AL Whitesburg Christian 2025 RHP 16.3
2 Joshua Henson AL Buckhorn 2025 SS 12.2
3 Zachary Schenck AL James Clemens 2026 3B 12.0
4 Casen Dutton AL Priceville 2026 RHP 9.1
5 Will Jones AL Huntsville High School 2026 OF 8.1

STRIKE ZONE RATE%

Rank Name State School Class Pos Zone %
1 Reece Thomas AL Huntsville High School 2025 2B 100 %
^ Aiden Kletke AL Sparkman High School 2024 OF 100 %
^ Brooks Harris AL Hazel Green High School 2026 2B 100 %
^ Zachary Schenck AL James Clemens 2026 3B 100 %
^ Jackson Nichols AL Scottsboro 2026 RHP 100 %
^ Truitt Taylor AL Huntsville High School 2025 RHP 100 %
2 Landon Scott AL Huntsville High School 2025 OF 75 %
3 David Potts AL Skyline 2028 RHP 66 %
4 Will Jones AL Huntsville High School 2026 OF 50 %
5 Casen Dutton AL Priceville 2026 RHP 33 %
^ Graham Segraves AL Bob Jones 2027 RHP 33 %

+ CLICK HERE for a look at the complete statistics from the event.


 

+ Follow on Twitter: @PBR_Alabama
+ Follow on Instagram: @PBR_Alabama
+ Follow on Facebook: PBR Alabama

  

+ Click HERE to create a free profile.
+ Click HERE to purchase a subscription which gives you access to additional information on the site. 

  

Related Content: