Prep Baseball Report

Northern Utah Open: Pitching Data Dive


Cam Black-Araujo
Assistant Director, PBR Canada

On Saturday, September 16th, the PBR Utah staff hosted the Northern Utah Open at Ridgeline High School in West Millville, Utah. This event featured roughly 50 prospects from the 2024 - 2027 classes and allowed our staff an opportunity to get an in-depth look at the players in attendance.

Earlier this week, we broke down the top measurable data performers from the event with our Statistical Analysis. Now, we will take a further in-depth look at the top pitchers with the help of our tech partnerships, broken down by the categories down below:

For complete event results, click here.
To view upcoming event schedule, click here.

FASTBALL

MAX VELOCITY (MPH)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Velocity (max)
1 Degan Rigby UT Bear River 2024 RHP 87.5 mph
2 Aden McPhie UT Sky View 2024 RHP 84.8 mph
3 Gage Clark UT Weber 2024 RHP 84.5 mph
4 Delton Cramer UT Bingham 2025 RHP 84.0 mph
5 Kamren Shirreffs UT Northridge 2025 RHP 82.4 mph
6 Castle Huggard UT Juan Diego Catholic 2025 RHP 81.2 mph
7 Jacob Beesley UT Skyline 2025 RHP 80.7 mph
8 Madex Vonhatten UT Tooele 2025 OF 80.5 mph
9 Brayden Hansen UT Lehi 2026 RHP 80.4 mph
10 Payson Dansie UT Bear River 2026 SS 80.4 mph

Max Fastball Velocity: This metric calculates the speed of the pitch as it’s released from the pitcher’s hand.

SPIN RATE (AVG)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Spin Rate (avg)
1 Brayden Hansen UT Lehi 2026 RHP 2380 rpm
2 Torben Van Boerum UT Olympus 2026 RHP 2316 rpm
3 Degan Rigby UT Bear River 2024 RHP 2288 rpm
4 Castle Huggard UT Juan Diego Catholic 2025 RHP 2233 rpm
5 Gage Clark UT Weber 2024 RHP 2226 rpm
6 Delton Cramer UT Bingham 2025 RHP 2207 rpm
7 Jacob Beesley UT Skyline 2025 RHP 2136 rpm
8 Robert Remy UT Mountain Ridge 2026 RHP 2073 rpm
9 Dalton Fay UT Mountain Ridge High 2027 3B 2070 rpm
10 Garrison Garton UT Layton 2024 RHP 2056 rpm

Spin Rate: This metric calculates the rate of spin on the baseball as it leaves the pitcher’s hand, measured in revolutions per minute (rpm). Historical data shows that high-spin fastballs lessen the impact of gravity, allowing for more ‘rise’ (or less fall, in other words) as it carries through the zone. Low-spin fastballs typically indicate the pitch has greater horizontal action, often making it tougher to square up, but generally easier to make contact with, leading to more ground balls, while high-spin fastballs show a correlation with swings and misses.

INDUCED VERTICAL BREAK (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos IVB (avg)
1 Brayden Hansen UT Lehi 2026 RHP 17.1 in
2 Castle Huggard UT Juan Diego Catholic 2025 RHP 16.8 in
3 Cael Kidman UT Ridgeline 2025 OF 16.3 in
4 Delton Cramer UT Bingham 2025 RHP 14.5 in
5 Aden McPhie UT Sky View 2024 RHP 14.3 in

Induced Vertical Break: Used in short form as "IVB," this metric is most important on fastballs for creating rise and on curveballs for creating depth – it can also have some use when measuring sliders and cutters as well. Sliders tend to be closer to zero inches while cutters are generally between 5 and 15 inches. Usually fastballs and curveballs with large IVB have higher spin efficiencies as well. Sliders generally have very little (closer to zero) IVB and very low spin efficiency. You could also categorize IVB into spin rate as this is part of the “useful movement” you’re looking for. IVB is also a huge part of the vertical approach angle.

HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos HM (avg)
1 Daxton Sorensen UT Cottonwood 2025 OF 13.9
2 Nolan Furgal UT Stansbury 2025 LHP -13.8
3 Jackson Kyhl UT Bountiful High 2025 LHP -13.6
4 Payson Dansie UT Bear River 2026 SS 13.1
5 Anders Pearson UT Skyridge 2025 3B 12.3

Horizontal Break: Outlined on TrackMan’s own website: “... horizontal movement is measured in inches between where the pitch actually crosses the front of home plate side-wise, and where it would have crossed home plate side-wise if had it traveled in a perfectly straight line from release. A positive number means the break was to the right from the pitcher’s perspective, while a negative number means the break was to the left from the pitcher’s perspective.”

STRIKE ZONE RATE%

Rank Name State School Class Pos Zone %
1 Ripken Jensen UT Ridgeline 2026 SS 66 %
^ Delton Cramer UT Bingham 2025 RHP 66 %
2 Degan Rigby UT Bear River 2024 RHP 60 %
3 Jacob Beesley UT Skyline 2025 RHP 50 %
^ Brayden Hansen UT Lehi 2026 RHP 50 %
^ Jackson Kyhl UT Bountiful High 2025 LHP 50 %
^ Madex Vonhatten UT Tooele 2025 OF 50 %
^ Carson Freeman UT Tooele 2025 RHP 50 %

CURVEBALL

SPIN RATE (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Spin Rate (avg)
1 Delton Cramer UT Bingham 2025 RHP 2483 rpm
2 Castle Huggard UT Juan Diego Catholic 2025 RHP 2381 rpm
3 Torben Van Boerum UT Olympus 2026 RHP 2269 rpm
4 Nolan Furgal UT Stansbury 2025 LHP 2168 rpm
5 Brayden Hansen UT Lehi 2026 RHP 2155 rpm

INDUCED VERTICAL BREAK (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos IVB (avg)
1 Brayden Hansen UT Lehi 2026 RHP -12.3 in
2 Cael Kidman UT Ridgeline 2025 OF -8.3 in
3 Torben Van Boerum UT Olympus 2026 RHP -6.8 in
4 Robert Remy UT Mountain Ridge 2026 RHP -6.7 in
5 Garrison Garton UT Layton 2024 RHP -6.5 in

HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT (AVG.)

 

Rank Name State School Class Pos HM (avg)
1 Anders Pearson UT Skyridge 2025 3B -15.4
2 Aden McPhie UT Sky View 2024 RHP -14.6
3 Brayden Hansen UT Lehi 2026 RHP -14.3
4 Torben Van Boerum UT Olympus 2026 RHP -13.5
5 Payson Dansie UT Bear River 2026 SS -13.3

STRIKE ZONE RATE%

Rank Name State School Class Pos Zone %
1 Ripken Jensen UT Ridgeline 2026 SS 66 %
^ Delton Cramer UT Bingham 2025 RHP 66 %
2 Degan Rigby UT Bear River 2024 RHP 60 %
3 Jacob Beesley UT Skyline 2025 RHP 50 %
^ Brayden Hansen UT Lehi 2026 RHP 50 %
^ Jackson Kyhl UT Bountiful High 2025 LHP 50 %
^ Madex Vonhatten UT Tooele 2025 OF 50 %
^ Carson Freeman UT Tooele 2025 RHP 50 %

SLIDER

SPIN RATE (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Spin Rate (avg)
1 Gage Clark UT Weber 2024 RHP 2379
2 Jacob Beesley UT Skyline 2025 RHP 2194
3 Aden McPhie UT Sky View 2024 RHP 2102
4 Torben Van Boerum UT Olympus 2026 RHP 2060

INDUCED VERTICAL BREAK (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos IVB (avg)
1 Aden McPhie UT Sky View 2024 RHP 7.2 in
2 Torben Van Boerum UT Olympus 2026 RHP -5.9 in
3 Jacob Beesley UT Skyline 2025 RHP 4.7 in
4 Gage Clark UT Weber 2024 RHP -3.5 in

HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos HM (avg)
1 Torben Van Boerum UT Olympus 2026 RHP -12.6
2 Aden McPhie UT Sky View 2024 RHP -8.8
3 Gage Clark UT Weber 2024 RHP -2.9
4 Jacob Beesley UT Skyline 2025 RHP -2.8

STRIKE ZONE RATE%

Rank Name State School Class Pos Zone %
1 Torben Van Boerum UT Olympus 2026 RHP 50 %
^ Aden McPhie UT Sky View 2024 RHP 50 %
^ Jacob Beesley UT Skyline 2025 RHP 50 %

CHANGEUP

HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos HM (avg)
1 Mason Ward UT Salem Hills 2025 SS 16.0
2 Brayden Hansen UT Lehi 2026 RHP 15.4
3 Robert Remy UT Mountain Ridge 2026 RHP 15.2
4 Delton Cramer UT Bingham 2025 RHP 14.8
5 Torben Van Boerum UT Olympus 2026 RHP 14.7

STRIKE ZONE RATE%

Rank Name State School Class Pos Zone %
1 Jackson Kyhl UT Bountiful High 2025 LHP 100 %
^ Payson Dansie UT Bear River 2026 SS 100 %
2 Daxton Sorensen UT Cottonwood 2025 OF 75 %
3 Castle Huggard UT Juan Diego Catholic 2025 RHP 50 %
^ Robert Remy UT Mountain Ridge 2026 RHP 50 %
^ Anders Pearson UT Skyridge 2025 3B 50 %

UPCOMING EVENTS

SHOWCASE STATE DATE LOCATION
2023 PBR Scout Day: GBG Utah UT 09/30 The Hive - Juab High School Fieldhouse
2023 PBR Scout Day: RA Baseball Academy UT 10/07 Juan Diego Catholic HS
2023 PBR JUCO Scout Day: Salt Lake CC UT 10/10 Cate Field
Utah State Games (Invite-Only) UT 10/29 Snow Canyon High School
2023 Utah Winter Update UT 12/02 The Hive - Juab High School Fieldhouse

RECENT NEWS