Prep Baseball Report

CSI Scout Day: Pitching Data Dive


Cam Black-Araujo
Idaho Operations

On Friday, October 6rd, the PBR Idaho staff travelled into Twin Falls to host our annual College of Southern Idaho Scout Day on campus at Skip Walker Field. This event featured 43 players within the Golden Eagles baseball program, both freshman and sophomores, and allowed our staff an opportunity to get an in-depth first look at the talent within the junior college program.

Earlier this week, we broke down the top measurable data performers from the event with our Statistical Analysis. Now, we will take a further in-depth look at the top pitchers with the help of our tech partnerships, broken down by the categories down below:

For complete event results, click here.
To view upcoming event schedule, click here.

FASTBALL

MAX VELOCITY (MPH)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Velocity (max)
1 Coleman Bobb UT Green Canyon 2023 RHP 95.3 mph
2 Dax Newman UT American Fork 2022 RHP 92.8 mph
3 Kyle Bassett VA Patriot 2019 RHP 92.5 mph
4 Kaden Cloward UT Spanish Fork 2022 RHP 91.7 mph
5 Ethan Gardner ID Borah 2022 RHP 91.0 mph
6 Brennen Chappell ID Kimberly 2022 RHP 91.0 mph
7 Andrew White UT Cyprus 2020 RHP 90.7 mph
8 Cooper Littledike UT Maple Mountain 2021 RHP 90.2 mph
9 Garrett Miller ID Timberline 2022 RHP 90.0 mph
10 Nolan Miller UT Salem Hills 2023 OF 89.8 mph

Max Fastball Velocity: This metric calculates the speed of the pitch as it’s released from the pitcher’s hand.

SPIN RATE (AVG)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Spin Rate (avg)
1 Mark Henderson ID Riverton 2023 LHP 2303 rpm
2 Andrew White UT Cyprus 2020 RHP 2257 rpm
3 Shaydon Benson UT Parowan 2022 LHP 2234 rpm
4 Ethan Gardner ID Borah 2022 RHP 2206 rpm
5 Kyle Bassett VA Patriot 2019 RHP 2175 rpm
6 Brennen Chappell ID Kimberly 2022 RHP 2170 rpm
7 Dax Newman UT American Fork 2022 RHP 2148 rpm
8 Kaden Cloward UT Spanish Fork 2022 RHP 2133 rpm
9 Logan Smith ID Dimond 2022 RHP 2123 rpm
10 Coleman Bobb UT Green Canyon 2023 RHP 2109 rpm

Spin Rate: This metric calculates the rate of spin on the baseball as it leaves the pitcher’s hand, measured in revolutions per minute (rpm). Historical data shows that high-spin fastballs lessen the impact of gravity, allowing for more ‘rise’ (or less fall, in other words) as it carries through the zone. Low-spin fastballs typically indicate the pitch has greater horizontal action, often making it tougher to square up, but generally easier to make contact with, leading to more ground balls, while high-spin fastballs show a correlation with swings and misses.

INDUCED VERTICAL BREAK (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos IVB (avg)
1 Ashton Johnson UT Olympus 2022 LHP 18.2 in
2 Kyle Bassett VA Patriot 2019 RHP 16.6 in
3 Dax Newman UT American Fork 2022 RHP 16.2 in
4 Nolan Miller UT Salem Hills 2023 OF 14.1 in
5 Logan Smith ID Dimond 2022 RHP 13.6 in
6 Mario DeLeon ID Columbia 2023 13.6 in
7 Andrew White UT Cyprus 2020 RHP 11.8 in
8 Shaydon Benson UT Parowan 2022 LHP 11.2 in
9 Coleman Bobb UT Green Canyon 2023 RHP 11.2 in
10 Kason Oneil ID Kuna 2023 1B 10.4 in

Induced Vertical Break: Used in short form as "IVB," this metric is most important on fastballs for creating rise and on curveballs for creating depth – it can also have some use when measuring sliders and cutters as well. Sliders tend to be closer to zero inches while cutters are generally between 5 and 15 inches. Usually fastballs and curveballs with large IVB have higher spin efficiencies as well. Sliders generally have very little (closer to zero) IVB and very low spin efficiency. You could also categorize IVB into spin rate as this is part of the “useful movement” you’re looking for. IVB is also a huge part of the vertical approach angle.

HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos HM (avg)
1 Malcolm Bartholomew UT Dixie 2022 LHP -12.6
2 Peyton Hines ID Rocky Mountain 2023 RHP 12.6
3 Mark Henderson ID Riverton 2023 LHP -12.1
4 Coleman Bobb UT Green Canyon 2023 RHP 11.9
5 Ethan Gardner ID Borah 2022 RHP 11.5
6 Aiden Turley UT Syracuse 2021 RHP 11.0
7 Shaydon Benson UT Parowan 2022 LHP -10.9
8 Brennen Chappell ID Kimberly 2022 RHP 10.8
9 Brock Snow AZ Mountain View 2023 LHP -10.7
10 Logan Smith ID Dimond 2022 RHP 9.7

Horizontal Break: Outlined on TrackMan’s own website: “... horizontal movement is measured in inches between where the pitch actually crosses the front of home plate side-wise, and where it would have crossed home plate side-wise if had it traveled in a perfectly straight line from release. A positive number means the break was to the right from the pitcher’s perspective, while a negative number means the break was to the left from the pitcher’s perspective.”

STRIKE ZONE RATE%

Rank Name State School Class Pos Zone %
1 Cooper Littledike UT Maple Mountain 2021 RHP 100 %
2 Ashton Johnson UT Olympus 2022 LHP 90 %
3 Mark Henderson ID Riverton 2023 LHP 87 %
4 Garrett Miller ID Timberline 2022 RHP 85 %
5 Brennen Chappell ID Kimberly 2022 RHP 80 %
6 Ethan Gardner ID Borah 2022 RHP 69 %
^ Coleman Bobb UT Green Canyon 2023 RHP 69 %
7 Mario DeLeon ID Columbia 2023 60 %
8 Aiden Turley UT Syracuse 2021 RHP 57 %
^ Malcolm Bartholomew UT Dixie 2022 LHP 57 %

CURVEBALL

SPIN RATE (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Spin Rate (avg)
1 Brennen Chappell ID Kimberly 2022 RHP 2636 rpm
2 Myles Topham UT Canyon View 2023 RHP 2292 rpm
3 Malcolm Bartholomew UT Dixie 2022 LHP 2179 rpm
4 Shaydon Benson UT Parowan 2022 LHP 2158 rpm
5 Cooper Littledike UT Maple Mountain 2021 RHP 2143 rpm

INDUCED VERTICAL BREAK (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos IVB (avg)
1 Shaydon Benson UT Parowan 2022 LHP -12.8 in
2 Garrett Miller ID Timberline 2022 RHP -8.6 in
3 Logan Smith ID Dimond 2022 RHP -6.1 in
4 Myles Topham UT Canyon View 2023 RHP -5.7 in
5 Nolan Miller UT Salem Hills 2023 OF -5.5 in

HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos HM (avg)
1 Logan Smith ID Dimond 2022 RHP -12.2
2 Nolan Miller UT Salem Hills 2023 OF -9.2
3 Malcolm Bartholomew UT Dixie 2022 LHP 7.5
4 Shaydon Benson UT Parowan 2022 LHP 6.1
5 Myles Topham UT Canyon View 2023 RHP -5.8

STRIKE ZONE %

Rank Name State School Class Pos Zone %
1 Aiden Turley UT Syracuse 2021 RHP 100 %
^ Cooper Littledike UT Maple Mountain 2021 RHP 100 %
^ Garrett Miller ID Timberline 2022 RHP 100 %
^ Kason Oneil ID Kuna 2023 1B 100 %
2 Peyton Hines ID Rocky Mountain 2023 RHP 75 %

SLIDER

SPIN RATE (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos Spin Rate (avg)
1 Brennen Chappell ID Kimberly 2022 RHP 2619
2 Kaden Cloward UT Spanish Fork 2022 RHP 2519
3 Dax Newman UT American Fork 2022 RHP 2392
4 Brock Snow AZ Mountain View 2023 LHP 2323
5 Andrew White UT Cyprus 2020 RHP 2318

INDUCED VERTICAL BREAK (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos IVB (avg)
1 Ethan Gardner ID Borah 2022 RHP -6.2 in
2 Dax Newman UT American Fork 2022 RHP 5.3 in
3 Coleman Bobb UT Green Canyon 2023 RHP -5.1 in
4 Kyle Bassett VA Patriot 2019 RHP -4.4 in
5 Brennen Chappell ID Kimberly 2022 RHP -4.0 in

HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos HM (avg)
1 Kyle Bassett VA Patriot 2019 RHP -12.2
2 Brock Snow AZ Mountain View 2023 LHP 11.9
3 Kaden Cloward UT Spanish Fork 2022 RHP -11.3
4 Dax Newman UT American Fork 2022 RHP -8.1
5 Coleman Bobb UT Green Canyon 2023 RHP -7.8

STRIKE ZONE %

Rank Name State School Class Pos Zone %
1 Brennen Chappell ID Kimberly 2022 RHP 100 %
^ Shaydon Benson UT Parowan 2022 LHP 100 %
^ Kason Oneil ID Kuna 2023 1B 100 %
2 Dax Newman UT American Fork 2022 RHP 66 %
^ Brock Snow AZ Mountain View 2023 LHP 66 %

CHANGEUP

HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT (AVG.)

Rank Name State School Class Pos HM (avg)
1 Malcolm Bartholomew UT Dixie 2022 LHP -13.9
2 Shaydon Benson UT Parowan 2022 LHP -13.7
3 Logan Smith ID Dimond 2022 RHP 11.6
4 Mario DeLeon ID Columbia 2023 -11.2
5 Brock Snow AZ Mountain View 2023 LHP -10.1

STRIKE ZONE %

Rank Name State School Class Pos Zone %
1 Dax Newman UT American Fork 2022 RHP 100 %
^ Mario DeLeon ID Columbia 2023 100 %
^ Brennen Chappell ID Kimberly 2022 RHP 100 %
2 Aiden Turley UT Syracuse 2021 RHP 50 %
^ Cooper Littledike UT Maple Mountain 2021 RHP 50 %
^ Ashton Johnson UT Olympus 2022 LHP 50 %

RECENT NEWS